<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/</link>
	<description>Guest post here! Gues pos her! Gue po he! Gu p h! G! !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 011100110110010</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5043</link>
		<dc:creator>011100110110010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite <img src='http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rowland</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5040</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent rush to transparency seems like another instance of mutating and complicating something unnecessarily. In my opinion once factors like intent and objective come into play, we&#039;re F****d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent rush to transparency seems like another instance of mutating and complicating something unnecessarily. In my opinion once factors like intent and objective come into play, we&#8217;re F****d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 011100110110010</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5010</link>
		<dc:creator>011100110110010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. However it&#039;s a risky thing to do online as people will only be interpreting text and not necessarily tone. Does that make sense?

I think it says more about me that I presume that nearly every form of &#039;transparency&#039; is bullshit...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. However it&#8217;s a risky thing to do online as people will only be interpreting text and not necessarily tone. Does that make sense?</p>
<p>I think it says more about me that I presume that nearly every form of &#8216;transparency&#8217; is bullshit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cohen</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5009</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very true. On the whole idea of being transparent, I always go back to intent and objective. 

I think if the intent and objective for being transparent about a failure is pure, it has an endearing and redeeming affect. If not, the fake transparency just does more to erode trust.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. On the whole idea of being transparent, I always go back to intent and objective. </p>
<p>I think if the intent and objective for being transparent about a failure is pure, it has an endearing and redeeming affect. If not, the fake transparency just does more to erode trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 011100110110010</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5008</link>
		<dc:creator>011100110110010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David, this is an excellent interpretation of it. Unfortunately the line between the two is often cloudy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, this is an excellent interpretation of it. Unfortunately the line between the two is often cloudy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 011100110110010</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5007</link>
		<dc:creator>011100110110010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony, I admire your transparency on the subject.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony, I admire your transparency on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cohen</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5006</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s transparency when you publicly talk about a failure or act of douchery when nobody else knows about it.

It&#039;s PR when you publicly talk about a failure or act of douchery when everybody already knows about it.

...in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s transparency when you publicly talk about a failure or act of douchery when nobody else knows about it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s PR when you publicly talk about a failure or act of douchery when everybody already knows about it.</p>
<p>&#8230;in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pensabene</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5005</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pensabene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m going to be transparent in saying i&#039;m great for being transparent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m going to be transparent in saying i&#8217;m great for being transparent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Salcido</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Salcido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome post and quote! 

I now no longer wonder to myself, &quot;wow I must be an incredible douche bag because I keep my work guarded.&quot;

Although I do have to say that I have learned a great deal over the years from reading about other people&#039;s failures and victories. I&#039;ve received tremendous inspiration from other people&#039;s work and processes that they&#039;ve shared. 

But I agree with you that some go overboard with it in a salesy sort of way. There is a time and place for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post and quote! </p>
<p>I now no longer wonder to myself, &#8220;wow I must be an incredible douche bag because I keep my work guarded.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although I do have to say that I have learned a great deal over the years from reading about other people&#8217;s failures and victories. I&#8217;ve received tremendous inspiration from other people&#8217;s work and processes that they&#8217;ve shared. </p>
<p>But I agree with you that some go overboard with it in a salesy sort of way. There is a time and place for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 011100110110010</title>
		<link>http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/2012/11/transparency/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator>011100110110010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01100111011001010110010101101011.co.uk/?p=1673#comment-5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely a marketing ploy. I saw someone tweet that &quot;Transparency works better in a negative light than a positive one&quot; (or something similar). The use of works made me smile...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a marketing ploy. I saw someone tweet that &#8220;Transparency works better in a negative light than a positive one&#8221; (or something similar). The use of works made me smile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
